Test version 3.2.0.143 * NEW 08/10/2017 *

[tim arnot]

Build 143 is up.

[dempsey]

Thanks Tim.

Both the ILS feathers and the Aerodome info are now showing the correct ILS LOC value.

I rebuild the database using X_Plane 11.05 and everything went fine.

I also noticed that Plan-G is now processing the airspaces. I have an error in the Canada airspace, but will open a separate topic for that.

[tim arnot]

Please see the main web page for the release 3.2.0.144 download.

[dempsey]

Thanks Tim.

[fmrr94]

Hello,
i'm working with x-plane 11 on a windows 10 64bits PC. Plan-G 3.1.4 was working well - i intalled plan-g 3.2.0 on a new folder and buil a new database.
i do not be able to connect plan g to my simulator, despite having the same configuration... (DotNet v4.6.2 installed)
When i click on connexion, i have the sound, plan-f seems to be connected but no aircraft apprears (i have selected synchro !)
What could be the issue ?

[tim arnot]

Please attach the log file, thanks.

[androl2015]

just for say thanks a lot Tim for this version 3.2.0.144  beta

i fly  with p3dv4 and xplane 11 .and all is ok for me 

OS w.10

[Pyro]

Hello.
I have Windows Vista and FS9. Is it possible to install Plan-G 3.2 on this configuration?

[tim arnot]

Sorry, Plan-G requires DotNet 4.6.2, and the minimum OS for this is Windows 7.

[Pyro]

Can i find the version 3.1.4 Beta or other previous?
I used it but I had to uninstall it.

[tim arnot]

I'll see if I can find an old beta, and upload it. Probably be late tonight or tomorrow though.

[Pyro]

Thank you very much

[golfbravo]

Hi Tim,
I don't want to create a post just to ask a quick question.

Is there any hope that this version is developed for WinXP or should we migrate to WIN7 or newer?

I say this because currently my 3PC network works very well under WinXP ;-))

In any case, thank you Tim for everything you do for the simmers community.

[tim arnot]

Sadly no. The limiting factor is DotNet. 3.2 requires 4.6.2, and Microsoft doesn't support that in XP. Even before, XP had to be built on a separate code base, with different libraries. And while that was doable, it was quite a bit of effort, often requiring rewrites, and it only got 1% of the downloads compared to the Win7+ build. From which I have to conclude the XP user base is now a tiny minority.

[golfbravo]

Thank u very mutch Tim for these clarifications.